remade the cvs patches(was RE: [cpia] patches for cpia-drivers w

[Gleicon S. Moraes]

Hi !
Good move regarding the cpia patch.
I would like to know if that DMA transfer issue has been solved. (parport
module)
I've been out for a while and didn't checked the cvs. Does it contains a
TODO list ?
Best regards, keep up the good work


--
Gleicon S. Moraes
gleicon@terra.com.br
gleicon@uol.com.br
http://planeta.terra.com.br/informatica/gleicon

----- Original Message -----
From: <f.duncan.m.haldane@worldnet.att.net>
To: <cpia@risc.uni-linz.ac.at>
Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 4:05 PM
Subject: remade the cvs patches(was RE: [cpia] patches for cpia-drivers w


>
> On 15-Dec-2001 f.duncan.m.haldane@worldnet.att.net wrote:
> > Hi CPiA developers/users.
> >
> > Its probably time to get the updated
> > cpia driver from sourceforge into the official
> > linux kernel before cpia devices are completely
> > obsolete!
> >
> > I attach a bzipped tarball with updates
>
> <snip>
> OOPS!
> The second patch against the cvs source I made
> contained the first patch again (I somehow diff'ed the final result
> against the unpatched cvs source, not the intermediate one...)
>
>
> I remade the patches against the current cvs to seperate
> my own changes from the changes taken from current >=2.4.14
> kernels:
> in the new tarball:
> for_cvs/patch1  : this is the changes already included in the kernel
sources
> for_cvs/patch2  : this is  my extra little fixes.
>
> Apply first patch1, then patch2 to the lates cvs source in /cpia/module
> Sorry!
>
> The large diff against the official kernel >= 2.4.14 is in the
> first (large) tarball I sent, and not repeated here.
>
>
>
> Duncan Haldane
>
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: f.duncan.m.haldane@worldnet.att.net
> Date: 16-Dec-2001
> Time: 12:52:00
>
> This message was sent by XFMail
> ----------------------------------
>